I still like that 8% stuff youse guys in Canada brew. Nice. I did not get
drunk on it in Vancouver though. I got drunk on Fog Cutters instead. Jeeze,
that was in 1962 and I still remember parts of it well. Other parts....not
at all. Beer seems to need at least 6% alcohol to taste good. Is that true
or just my imagination? /jmac
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Gordon Ross
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:20 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: [OT]Beer...Re: 100mm f2.8, which is the good range?
But in all fairness, if you drink 15 or so fairly quickly you can still get
inebr-inebra-inebriadet- drunk. This was proven by research, personally
attended to, done in Buffalo NY in 1968.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "tOM Trottier" <tOM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: [OM] [OT]Beer...Re: 100mm f2.8, which is the good range?
> Dear James,
>
> Alas, most american beer is very thin, Pete's Wicked Ale and
> Samuel Adams excepted. I think it comes from having the
> standard strength set at 3%.
>
> It's like making love in a canoe... f*cking close to water.
>
> tOM
>
> On 18 Jan 2006 at 12:03,
> James N. McBride <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> A cold Bud is still very refreshing on a hot summer day even though it is
>> not as full-bodied as some of the others. One European on this list said
>> it
>> tasted like piss, but damn good piss. There are a lot of good beers and
>> variety is the spice of life. /jmac
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|