Moose wrote:
> Perhaps I can assist. Also note the comment on the 200/4,
> apropos of another recent thread.
> Unfortunately, you have not been entirely consistent in either
> the serial # of your magic 100/2.8 or the desireable range.
> Sometimes, my 110,98x is a winner :-) , sometimes a loser
Sorry Moosie. I just took a gander at my lenses. My 100/2.8 is
130xxx and the 200/4 is 138xxx.
I have no idea where I came up with 113xxx.
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|