They are both equally good lenses in different ways. The 14-54/2.8 excels
on DOF over the standard 14-45/3.5. The 50/2 is great for portraits,
macro, and offers awesome DOF.
- Ali
> I'd look at it from a standpoint of "additional capabilities". You don't
> pick up all that much by buying the 14-54 if you already own the 14-45.
> But the 50/2 gives you capabilities you don't already have.
>
> ---
> Scott Gomez
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: ZD 50/2
>
> Certainly the 50/2 is a nice lens...I can see that. Now my dilemma.. is
> the 14-54 F2.8 really that much better than the 14-45 F3.5? I have an
> opportunity to purchase either the 50/2 or the 14-54/2.8 right now.
>
> - Ali
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|