I do not print my own pictures, but FWIW here's a
very recent discussion from TidBITS on what to
look for in a photo printer.
http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=08376
TidBITS is an independent, Macintosh-oriented
weekly newsletter. The author of this and other
digital photography articles on TidBITS clearly
believes that digital is far superior to film,
but otherwise seems to know what he's talking
about ;-)
João T. da Costa
At 9:21 AM -0500 20.12.05, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>What opinions might there be in Zuikoland about the Epson 4000 printer? I
>am considering an upgrade from my Epson 1280. An offer of a 4000 at $775 has
>been made from a fellow who has had it for about 11 months. Assuming it all
>checks out, might that be a good move for printing my e-1 images. The other
>choice, should I decide to buy, is the Epson 4800 which has the new K3
>Ultrachrome inks. This option is good bit more
>expensive. Any opinions about
>either of these printers? Bill Barber
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|