Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Wildlife Photographer of the Year (OT)

Subject: [OM] Re: Wildlife Photographer of the Year (OT)
From: "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:59:21 -0700
I do have some test pics if I can find them. I will try. /jmac

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Moose
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 8:49 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Wildlife Photographer of the Year (OT)


Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:

>Has anyone here tested the 300 4.5 matched to the 2X-A ?
>Too bad ?
>C.H. commented about chroma IIRC.
>  
>
I've used that combination, but never for anything where I would compare 
sharpness to other lenses or the 300/4.5 by itself.

Gary's test of the combo didn't look very good, but it was with an OM-1, 
no additional support and no "hands on" damping. And adding the 2xA adds 
length and an additional connection where vibration could occur.

My TOPE 20 entry was done with this combo. It's not the kind of shot 
that depends on a super sharp lens, but the detail in the foreground 
trees and what detail is clear elsewhere at full size is good.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz