20 nov 2005 kl. 13.15 skrev Chuck Norcutt:
> Based on image stabilization I'd also choose the Minolta 7D. The
> Canon
> (and probably Nikon) IS implementation in the lens is probably a bit
> superior to trying to move the sensor around quickly but it does work
> fairly well and is dramatically cheaper than replacing all your lenses
> with IS glass.
A member of my local photography club is facing some problems with
his now not so new 20D. Or in fact problems with his lenses with IS.
The are not sharp, even when not using the IS photos comes out a bit
nonfocused. Most visible at far a way object. When he mounts a non-IS
zoom photos come out sharp. After having the camera in service for
moths and replacing of lens etc etc, the result is still not perfect,
but then again using other lenses it's. Anybody else with similar
experience? My small thought is that prime-lenses a sharp, zoom-
lenses a bit worse and IS-technologies makes a lens even bad.
/ johan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|