Andrew Dacey wrote:
>The best one that I heard related to this was of a man working at a
>company who had to write a report about the company's training. His
>report mentioned that they favoured a "pedagogical approach" to
>training. His manager saw that and terminated him since he didn't want
>a pervert working for the company. I can't remember if HR caught it or
>if it was only after a subsequent lawsuit that the man got his job
>back. The end result was that a memo was sent out requiring that any
>correspondence using words that managers might not know had to include
>the definition for the word.
>
>
Maybe the guy should have been fired anyway - for stupidity. :-)
I learned very early on in my long corporate career that the folks in
charge really don't appreciate having their limited knowledge of their
native languare, or of anything else, for that matter, shown up to them.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|