Not to worry Walt. I'm told this problem is common amongst senior citizens.
;o) ;o)
ScottGee1
p.s. Let me know if you don't get this by the weekend.
On 10/26/05, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> My posts are either (1) not making it through; (2) are appearing long after
> they are sent, or (3) are being ignored. I see John H. has responded to a
> post about batteries that hasn't even come to me yet, while my instant
> response to his query, suggesting the same supplier, apparently has suffered
> one of the three aforementioned fates.
>
> I posted a response yesterday to Bill Barber's painting with light problem,
> posing the solution of shining light through the viewfinder rather than
> taking the back off the camera, etc. I sent it off at 10:30 a.m. my time,
> but it didn't come back to me via the list until after noon. And then, hours
> later, two or three folks posted the same solution I had suggested, meaning
> they either hadn't received my post, had ignored it, or were blatantly and
> shamelessly stealing my thunder.
>
> If I'm boring y'all or have become a gadfly, I can find something else to do.
> There are lots of other places I can be invited out of.
>
> Just kidding. I enjoy this list too much to go 'way, even if some here seem
> to be a little slow on the uptake sometimes or apparently have a thumb
> permanently engaged in one end or the other. Y'all's kinda become my
> 'lectronic 'hood.
>
> I do, however, seem to be having e-mail problems, both going out and coming
> in. It may be time to find another ISP. Or something else to do. :-[
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|