Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: New Base for OM Lenses

Subject: [OM] Re: New Base for OM Lenses
From: alfredo pagliano <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:31:13 +0200
National Geographic too, while having already published entire 
assignments shoot in digital, tends to prefer drum scanned film, even 
though it's 35mm.

On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:22 PM, Walt Wayman wrote:

> Well, folks, so much for that bright idea.  My Epson 3200 scanner, 
> while good enough to make MF scans that turn into tack-sharp, 
> grainless 8x10 and 11x14 prints on the Epson Stylus 2200, just isn't 
> good enough to capture the fine detail I can plainly see with even an 
> 8X loupe, much less what's apparent with a 20X loupe.  This is why I 
> still have a real darkroom.
>
> I suppose, after making a 3200 dpi scan of the whole negative or 
> tranny on the Epson, I could cut the film up into pieces that would 
> fit into the Minolta 5400 in order to dig out more detail for the 
> extreme blow-ups of the teeny-weenie parts.  But it just ain't worth 
> the effort.  I've got more fun things to do in my retirement.  Anyway, 
> it gets tiresome always being right and boring proving it.  :-)
>
> I'll rest my case on the fact that Sports Illustrated, with 
> unimaginable resources, including the finest in digital gear, still 
> shoots the swimsuit issue on film with a Mamiya RZ67.  Maybe they just 
> don't know any better.
>
> As for round tuits, we have several.  For some reason, the people who 
> know us best give them to us.  Why is that? I wonder.
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> What are you scanning with?  Also, it seems to me that you were 
>> looking
>> for a round tuit several months ago.  Did you never find one or have 
>> you
>> already used it up?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Walt Wayman wrote:
>>
>>> I've toyed with the notion of posting some stuff I recently shot only
>> semi-seriously with the RB67, including full frame scans, accompanied 
>> by big
>> blow-ups of teeny-weenie parts thereof, just to prove that anybody 
>> who says any
>> 35mm-based DSLR is the equal of MF film doesn't know their ass from 
>> their elbow.
>>>
>>> But I'm lazy and haven't got a round tuit just yet.  But maybe soon, 
>>> since
>> some of these idiotarians are starting to piss me off.
>>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


        

        
                
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz