Paul,
I can testify to the quality of the 28/3,5 as I use it for exactly the same
purpose...:)
Never even seen the 2,8, but Gary's test suggest that it is slightly inferior.
The difference in cost does not justify the 28/2 IMHO, I think you pay for the
extra f-stops.
Only think that you have to remember is that you can't use it for underwater
photography as Fernando suggested. Fortunately, his did survive the
experiment...
Boris
P.S. Welcome to the list...:)
---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|