Don't want you to be disappointed, Winsor, so I should make clear that
Solaris is not what I would expect from a SF film (not sure what I *would*
expect from a SF film!). But take a look...
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Winsor Crosby
Sent: 19 July 2005 23:16
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: [photos] OT (taken with digital camera)
Maybe I will look at the Russian version. I like decent science fiction, and
maybe some that is not so decent, but I could not bring myself to watch
George Clooney for a couple of hours. What is the source of his popularity?
He has to be one of the least engaging actors in many years, at least for
me. Steven Soderbergh does not rate much higher for me with the possible
single exception of Traffic.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jul 19, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> on 19/07/2005 17:17, Piers Hemy at piers@xxxxxxxx, wrote:
>
>
>> Well now, Fernando, I am not sure I could find as many as 9 other
>> films in the same category as Solaris! Perhaps I should see the new
>> version - have you?
>>
> No, I didn't care. Think it might be wasting time...
> As for 9 other films in the same category, it depends how would you
> prefer to define 'same category'. Do you mean a SF category only, or
> other films which would stand up to its standard? I would take me a
> while and would certainly be very personal, but I'm certain I could
> find 9 other films.
>
> Fernando.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|