Yep, I think F-80's. Here's another shot:
http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-793350.html
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
> F-80, I think. Hang on. I'm looking for some more of these Ektachrome
> slides.
> Somebody got them filed out of place -- probably some old fart. At least
> they're not digital. Who'll be able to find, or even decode if they do find
> them, their diggies 40 years from now?
>
> Walt, still straddling the line
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Walt Wayman wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, I screwed up. Sorry. Try this'n:
> > >
> > >
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-793319.html
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > Jeez! You ain't so old. It does say "USAF" instead of Army Air Corps
> > and I don't see any props. But just barely I think. F-80 or T-33?
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|