| Subject: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:33:29 +1100 |
> Well... Only 2 years ago. And the lunch concept was a bit > fuzzy. I took > these on the way to my car > <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/ZAOrinda.htm>. > > I don't remember what film I was using, but it was an OM-4 > with Tamron > SP 60-300 on a tripod. > Great images Moose. ...Wayne ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Sigma macro, Andrew Palmer |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |