Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti

Subject: [OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:21:46 -0000
Use of lithium cells has been covered before, Rob. 

It's a no-no because of the constant low drain the OM imposes (perhaps that
is why you had to replace them).

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Rob Harrison
Sent: 03 March 2005 06:54
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti

Just went to replace the batteries for the first time in my newish-to-me
OM-4Ti, with the specified (2) SR44's, and found (1) CR1/3N inside. Hmm! The
discussions I've found so far on the difference don't cover lithium cells.
Anyone know if one way or the other makes a difference? I tend to favor
lithium cells in all my other cameras, since they're supposed to last
longer, but I don't actually know what the voltage decay characteristics
are.

Thanks in advance.

Rob Harrison
Seattle (not anywhere near Husky Stadium....)


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz