| Subject: | [OM] Re: 300/2.8 vs 150/2 vs 300/4 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:38:57 -0600 |
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:45:37 -0800, Winsor Crosby wrote: >And there are not too many 600mm equivalent 2.8 lenses around. Easy now, you're making my head spin. -- Barry B. Bean Bean & Bean Cotton Company Peach Orchard, MO www.beancotton.com www.beanformissouri.org ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: No digital for me! And a Question., Andrew McPhee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: B+W photography, Andrew McPhee |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 300/2.8 vs 150/2 vs 300/4, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] B+W photography, JOHN DUGGAN |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |