Matthew ....
Why a change of policy? Do they no longer reduce UV, do they no longer
protect the front lens element, do you have more filters than lenses?
For the very very slight retardation in image quality on the down side and
the protection of the front lens element on the upside, why would anyone
want to discard a high quality UV/sky filter costing relatively little and
jeopardize one's lens?
John Hudson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Born" <mborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Digest" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2005 09:16 AM
Subject: [OM] UV filters, anyone? (FS)
> I have a batch of UV filters in truly LN condition. I got a bunch when I
was
> rekindling my OM fires and accumulating lenses. Within a couple of months
I
> had a policy change about UV/sky filters and took 'em all off. So, I have
2
> B+W UV-Haze 010 multicoated filters and 3 Tiffen TMC UV multicoated
filters.
> The B+W come with their original foam lined little plastic boxes. One of
the
> Tiffens is still in the box, never used. New the B+Ws are $26.50 and the
> Tiffens are $16.50 (at B&H, anyway. Smoke damage extra.) If anyone's
> interested I'll send you a B+W for $13, a Tiffen for $8, shipped. They're
> all 49mm. I also have a Hoya MC UV filter in 55mm for $8. Was on a lens
for
> a month or so but never left the house. If you're a UV person and you want
> the whole lot make an offer.
>
> Matthew Born
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|