The 24 is a very useful focal length. I almost stopped using the 21
after getting it. I had the F2.8 because of a feeling that fewer lens
elements would reduce the problem of flare with a very wide angle lens.
The 24/2.8 is a very nice lens.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Nov 9, 2004, at 9:20 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
>
> Hi Francisco:
>
> I just took delivery of Gary Reese's 24/2.0 and it is a good lens not
> far
> off the 21/2.0. Fast, well made, close focus correction.
>
> Gord
>
> Here is a list of some of the web pages you should save for reference.
>
> http://accura.com.hk/OM/index.shtml
>
> http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/
> index.htm
>
> http://users2.ev1.net/~wesiddiquis/siddiq/olympus.html
>
> http://olympus.dementia.org/Hardware/
>
> http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif.htm
>
> http://homepages.caverock.net.nz/~bj/photography/zuikoholics/
> processors.htm
>
> http://www.skipwilliams.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bsb27242" <bsb27242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 11:13 AM
> Subject: [OM] 24mm f/2
>
>
>>
>> I'd like to know if the 24mm f/2 Zuiko is a good lens. I'm new in the
>> Olympus System, and very impressed with the 85mm f/2 (to me, it is
>> even
>> better than my Nikkor 105mm for portrairts).
>> Reviews is welcome about this lens.
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Francisco Campos
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|