Hi All,
As a newish member to the list, and a recent 3ti purchaser and
(currently dead) 4t owner, I would have to say that the difference is
mostly psychological... The 3ti just seems to fit better in my hand,
feel better when put to my eye. I know it's the same size and shape
etc..., but I just seem to "click" better (pardon the pun) with the
3ti than I ever did with my 4t.
Ok, so it cost a fair bit of cash, but I don't intend to buy another
camera for some time - maybe even pass it down to my kids (if they can
work out what old fangled film stuff is by the time they are old
enough).
Should I have spent the cash on a leica or something current?
probably, but I already had some om lenses, and I figure that as long
as I can get film, I can keep taking photos with it.
Oh well, just my 2 quids worth.
I'm off to lurk again!
ChrisB.
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:37:47 -0700, Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> on 10/27/04 4:46 PM, Ing. Radovan Faltus at faltusr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>
> > I hope its not too cruel to 3Ti owners,
> > but I see only 3 not big adantages of 3Ti compared with 4Ti:
> > 1) pleasing sound of mechanical shutter control (have a OM1 second body)
> > 2) variable ambient/flashlight ratio in TTL mode (flash with more manual
> > modes can do the work)
> > 3) all speeds available after batts die (one set of spares is the solution)
> > But 4Ti has many advantages.
> >
> > Is mechanical shutter more reliable in low temperatures? I think its myth,
> > my OM1 didn't have worked in subzero temperatures most probably because of
> > moisture
> > condensated on shutter control mechanism. I beleive elmag. shutter control
> > are not so sensitive. What's opinion of specialists?
> >
> > Radek
>
> Its also the best color of any camera out there...
> --
>
> Jim Brokaw
> OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|