Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Glitzy hood

Subject: [OM] Re: Glitzy hood
From: James Royall <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 23:53:41 +0100
I think as I got the metal version for such a steal, I should keep a 
look out for the rubber model as well - I don't often go taking 
pictures in black tie.

James


On 3 Sep 2004, at 18:56, Moose wrote:

> That is the early version of the hood. Perfect with chrome OM-1 and
> silvernose 50mm lens. More "dress-up" and less practical than the later
> rubber models, as it can be dinged and scratched. Like them, it may be
> reversed over the lens for carrying/storage. It is also a correct hood
> for the 35-70/3.5-4.5 and will reverse over that lens too.
>
> Excellent price!
>
> Moose
>
> James Royall wrote:
>
>> I just received a metal hood which can be used for the 1.4 and 1.8 50s
>> and the 2.8 35 and I'm struck by the amount of chrome on it - it looks
>> almost out of place. The 2.8 24mm screw-in (thanks Bill!) and rubber
>> 35-70 hoods I have to compare it to are much more muted. Is the Vegas
>> look common to others?
>>
>> BTW I got the hood for £1.21 (plus £1 shipping) from Ehbay, which I
>> thought a pretty good price.
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz