Wayne, exactly my experience too. I guess, since we have all sorts of
computer editing available to get the image "perfect" after the fact;
consciously or
unconsciously, we aren't paying as much attention while shooting off images
with our digitals as we do when shooting film. That may be one of the big
reasons shooting digital just doesn't satisfy me like shooting film does.
Basically,
in 50 words or less- When shooting with the E-10 I feel I'm less of a
photographer and more of a computer nerd. When shooting with the OMs, _I'm_ the
one
getting it right, (hopefully) not the electronics inside the computer.
George S.
om4t@xxxxxxxx writes:
> I've noticed that when I go back to taking pictures
> with the OM-4t after shooting a while with the E-1 is that I will do a
> better job of editing at the moment of taking the picture, where as
> with digital, I go ahead and take the picture and edit later. This may
> be a detriment for me. Editing is probably the single most important
> function or skill for me as a photographer to learn. Without editing
> there is no progress or improvement in my work, and no direction. With
> the OM-4t, the discipline of editing in the moment may make for better
> seeing on my part. Taking a plethora of photographs with the E-1, may
> produce a winner, but only because of shear volume rather than seeing
> in the moment. There is no reason it has to be that way, it just tends
> to for me.
>
> Wayne
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|