Given the choice between leaving negative feedback, or none, I think it
is usually preferably to leave none. Although there are always low-lifes
out there whom deserve -ve. And forums such as this can enable -ve ( or
worse ), without any potential stigma of actual -ve feedback.
Tread softly and carry a big stick
Moose wrote:
>I understand your idea of what neutral "should" mean. It is, however,
>completely at odds with actual usage.
>
>Even in a theoretical sense, I don't really quite agree with your
>position. I tend to think positive for a fully satisfactory transaction
>and neutral for an acceptable, but not entirely satisfactory one. For
>really outstanding transactions, I use superlatives in the feedback
>itself. In practice, I don't do neutrals, as I believe you are right; a
>significant number of eBayers seem to view a neutral as a sort of
>chickens*** negative. So, on the "when in Rome...." principle, I avoid
>them. A couple of times, I have simply avoided leaving a feedback when
>somehwat dissatified with the outcome, but not believing that a negative
>is justified.
>
>Moose
>
>Joseph Ascione wrote:
>
>
>
>>I have just sold my first piece on e-bay but.................
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|