Didn't anybody notice the listing doesn't say what lens mount it is for?
He has other auctions for both Nik*n and Can*n mount lenses. So I
e-mailed him a question. By the time he replied, it was sold. Either
someone got a quicker reply (he did appologize for having been
unavailable), or they just took their chances. I wasn't willing to do
that. I think it is pretty clear that it isn't OM., although he doesn't
specifically state what it is in his reply, just that it sold.
Moose
Walt Wayman wrote:
>Believe me, I was tempted. The seller is about a 30-minute drive from me, so
>I could go pick the thing up. But I've already got a Tamron 300/2.8 in
>perfect condition, which I use less than I should because it's so heavy and
>I'm so lazy. What would I do with two honking big and heavy 300/2.8 lenses?
>Wouldn't that be silly?
>
>Still, I'm suffering a bout of non-buyer's regret right now.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|