Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: honest vendors and feedback

Subject: [OM] Re: honest vendors and feedback
From: Rob Harrison <robhar@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:50:05 -0700
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, at 12:29  AM, Philippe Le Zuikomane wrote:

> This means the item condition was misrepresented, the seller refused 
> to address it by offering a return or a rebate, and you should file a 
> fraud complaint with eBay.

I agree. Seems to me this is exactly the kind of behavior recording and 
displaying feedback is intended to discourage. The whole system is 
dependent on appropriate feedback.

Another thing to keep in mind is not to leave feedback too soon.

I learned this through sad experience, on like my 7th or 8th auction. 
When I was just getting started with my L*eica last August,  I won an 
Elmar 50/2.8 lens from ebay seller Jonathan Bloom, ID "platypuspaw"  
for $290--about what a perfectly functioning one ought to go for. It 
was described as mint minus, perfectly functioning. I got the lens, it 
looked fabulous, I left glowing feedback. Took my first roll with the 
lens and _all_ the shots were low contrast and out of focus more on one 
side than the other. I contacted the Jonathan as soon as I got the 
first roll back--a week or so later. I asked him if the lens had ever 
been apart, or if he'd noticed any issues. He told me he hadn't had any 
focus problems with the lens, it had never been apart, that it was my 
technique. I shot another roll just with that lens, really "focusing" 
on getting the focus right, pulling the lens out and locking it--same 
problems, and I told him so. I told him I'd take it into a local repair 
shop to have them look at it. Unfortunately, what with a new baby, 
running my own business and moving to our new house, it took me three 
months to get the lens to Focal Point, Inc in CO for an evaluation, and 
another month to hear the results--so it was five months from the close 
of the auction I had an objective outside opinion that the lens he'd 
represented as perfect was in fact a POS. John at Focal Point told me 
the front element was canted in the mount (obviously reinstalled 
improperly) and badly hazed to boot. The only real fix was to replace 
the element, to the tune of $250. I contacted Jonathan (platypuspaw) 
again, after many e-mails he reluctantly agreed to a $125 partial 
refund...which he then never sent, and now will not return e-mails. I 
left a follow-up feedback on the transaction, but after the initial 
positive, it doesn't change his rating. And in any case he's not 
selling under that ID any longer, so I suspect he's out there under a 
different ID. Use caution!

Rob Harrison
Seattle


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz