ML Archiv: [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor

Subject:	[OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor
From:	Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 06 Mar 2004 20:40:38 -0500

Ditto. I tested a Tamron 28-200 as a walkaround lens. It was too warm
(compared to my 50/1.4) so I dropped the idea. Sample variation perhaps?

Andrew

> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:41:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: Donald Shedrick <shedridc@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I have not found the OM Zuikos to be warm in general.  My Tamron
> 65-300 is very noticably warm compared to any of my Zuikos.


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] [OT] Engineering, acoustical, electronic & otherwise., (continued) [OM] [OT] Engineering, acoustical, electronic & otherwise., Ian Nichols [OM] Re: [OT] Engineering, acoustical, electronic & otherwise., Doug [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Pschings [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, W Shumaker [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Earl Dunbar [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Tris Schuler [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, John Hermanson [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Craig Henrikson [OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Andrew Gullen <=

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Once a year portrait, C.H.Ling
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: The MA-1 OM to E-1 adapter will be available in the, Andrew Gullen
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: OM to E1 adaptor, Craig Henrikson
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: OT Computer trivia, was Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 question, Scott Gomez
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]