Yes, I knew it wasn't a completely fair comparison, but I'm just pointing out
that a F100 user would, if he didn't understand nor respect what Olympus was
capable of, or, if he was the type who had to have the latest bells and
whistles, turn his nose up and think we were using obsolete equipment.
I don't think film was that bad in the 80's, I'd think you'd maybe have to go
back to the 60's, but I may be wrong.
George S.
md@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> An OM-4 may not be obsolete, but if you were forced to only use films which
> were available in the 80's it might be. The quality of film has greatly
> improved since that time and that same OM-4 produces far better results
> using modern films. Any digital camera that you buy today will never be
> able to take advantage of newer technology, the comparision to an OM-4
> isn't really fair.
> -mark
>
|