ML Archiv: Re: [OM] test

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] test

from Gregg Iverson

Subject:	Re: [OM] test
From:	Gregg Iverson <golftooter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:50:25 -0500

Then wouldn't that be 2.2 ?

gregg

NOPE! It's 22. I said "and", not "plus". }:^)> }:^)>

                     Yours running the numbers,

                              Garry


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] test, Wayne Re: [OM] test, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] test, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] test, Garth Wood Re: [OM] test, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] test, Stephen Troy Re: [OM] test, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] test, Gregg Iverson <= Re: [OM] test, Moose Re: [OM] test, Jeff Keller Re: [OM] test, AG Schnozz Re: [OM] was: test now: ballerina of prose, Steve Goss

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Earl Dunbar
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] A last hurrah?, Gregg Iverson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] test, Garry D. Lewis
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] test, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]