| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM Aperture Induced Vibration Question |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:15:42 -0700 |
I think the only relationship between those 2 cameras is the mechanical
part of the mount and the name over it.
Moose Winsor Crosby wrote: Moose wrote:One advantage the Nik*n F2 had over the OM-1 was both mirror and aperture lock-up.They forgot it on the D100. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] First roll w/ E-6 @ home (OT), andrew fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT getting ripped off on *bay, andrew fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM Aperture Induced Vibration Question, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: [OM] thinking of trading ONE OM1n for a compact RF.. ideas?, Boris Grigorov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |