ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-)

from Fernando Gonzalez Gentile

Subject:	Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-)
From:	Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:43:26 -0300

on 5/10/2003 22:27, Wayne Harridge at wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Oops, I meant 250mm end of the zoom.
Yes I understood the typo.

Linear distortion mentioned by Moose disturbes me more, because I hadn't
tested for it. Could a side-viewed piano keboard be a good test?

Fernando.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: Re: Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <= Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Mike Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Jon Mitchell Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Jim Brokaw

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re: Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Wayne Harridge
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Repro ratios, was Fame at last - perhaps ;-), Mike
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]