| Subject: | Re: [OM] 65-200mm cloudy rear lens |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:16:26 -0700 |
iwert wrote: 5x zoom ratio vs 3x for the 65-200 may have something to do with value as well, even though it's a bit slower.Don, I have two 50-250's and neither shows the problem, the difference in $$ is more because they are a very late introduction in the OM system and therefore rare. Moose < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] [OT] KK news, Brian Swale |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 65-200mm cloudy rear lens, John Hermanson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 65-200mm cloudy rear lens, iwert |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Anyone rember Barry's Cameras?, MiamiDolphins1 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |