Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Regarding what OT is OK

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Regarding what OT is OK
From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:24:29 -0400
Well, I had intended to make my response off list, but forgot. The send
button is too easy to hit sometimes....

I'm not sure we'll ever come to a consensus about what OT is ok and what is
not. Depends on who is reading and responding at the time. With so many list
members, I'm sure the active (posting) mix changes frequently. In
retrospect, I know I was dreadfully guilty of the wildly off topic thread
regarding Vegamite. Somehow it didn't draw the death threats associated with
Nik*n digital even though it was beyond any photo relation possible. Sorry
'bout than one...

I have no doubt that this OT thread about OT threads will continue to rival
the classic OT threads we've experienced.

-Mickey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OT.. 6x7 or 6x9?


> Somebody needs to satisfy my curiosity.  OT discussions of MF cameras are
> OK, but OT discussions of Nikon digitals are not OK.
>
> Honestly, since I'll never go MF, these discussions, which come up every
few
> weeks, bore the heck out of me.
>
> Aren't there any MF lists?
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz