Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Re: ( OM) 100mm 2 vs 2.8

Subject: RE: [OM] Re: ( OM) 100mm 2 vs 2.8
From: "Daniel" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:15:11 -1000
let's see the rabbit shot again
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of José Adolfo Segura
md
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:09 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: ( OM) 100mm 2 vs 2.8


----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <o.greve@xxxxxxx>; <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:35 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: ( OM) 100mm 2 vs 2.8


> I don't agree that I'd *never * take my 100/2.8, but the f/2 is VERY
sharp, and
> it focuses down to 0.7 metre. And the bokeh? Who remembers my rabbit
> shot on Robert Gries' exchange site, or the poppy photos I had on my
own
> site once?. marvellous bokeh, and several people un-prompted,
mentioned
it.
>
>.
>
> Brian
>

Brian,

 can you give me the url to see the rabbit? I need evidence before send
my
100/2.8 to the Guillotine :)
More, I'll have two with the stock I bought to the photographer of
Gaspesie
(Quebec)
I'll get  all the stuff on wenesday Yeah!!!

José

PS:  Thanks  Garth   :))))))



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz