Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] ( OM) OT in part but the image is a Zuiko one

Subject: [OM] ( OM) OT in part but the image is a Zuiko one
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:45:29 +1200
Hi all,

I want to thank you all for the helpful comments and advice re putting images 
on CDROMs. And the comments on that image (it was largely luck to find 
such a malnourished fern <hence the colour> and in such excellent lighting 
with little wind. But I still had to crouch over it for about 30 minutes to get 
2 
exposures) - I like it too.

Regarding the quality and pixelation of the image.

The print (I agree is a little small) is a good copy of the slide. I scanned at 
400 ppi. The bmp image from that scan reproduces (on my screen) with a 
sharpness that I would be happy to see on the CDROM.

(NOTE when I tried uploading it to my site this BMP image utterly refused to 
upload properly despite several attempts. The top half came out black, and 
the colours of the bottom half were absolutely wrong. So I had to make a hi-
res jpeg and use that instead. It is > 500kb - if anybody wants to see it I can 
try e-mailing it )

The Konica - printed version on the Avery label has nasty and excessive 
pixelation. OK if you hold the CDROM at arms' length; but anybody who 
wants to examine the image closely will be disappointed - and it looks cheap.

And actually, money-wise it's not cheap to produce.

NZ dollars - the Avery label pages are $0.65 each - 2 labels per page. The 
printing costs about $3.50 per page, and they charge $8.50 for computer 
time.

So 4 trial labels cost me $16.80 NZ or $9.80 USD.

I have food for thought and action there.

Sincerely,

Brian

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] ( OM) OT in part but the image is a Zuiko one, Brian Swale <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz