Hi dan,
Sorry, I think it may be or may not be true, since the two shots was having
a time different of 2 1/2 years, something may built up with time. I think
to make the comparison more accurate I have to shoot them again.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Mitchell" <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx>
> One interesting thing -- looking at the cropped centre portions, if you
> look at the white/blue building in the middle right, the Velvia does have
> more detail on the lettering, but _less_ detail on the rectangular pattern
> of tiles/blocks/whatever around the lettering. I think this is the grain
in
> the film showing up and overpowering the relatively subtle distinction --
> but it's definitely visible on the 10D shot. The same thing happens on the
> other white/blue building in the bottom left, too.
>
> I think this is what people are talking about when they say digitals are
> 'better than' film -- if you enlarged the Velvia shot to an enormous size,
> the grain would probably be noticeable enough to overcome the improved
> resolution -- the 10D shot may have less detail there, but it'll enlarge
> without grain showing up, which may be better for some purposes.
>
> -- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|