Nice shots for comparison. Unless I'm mistaken, they are basically
identical images except for cropping or blowing up because the subject
matter is too far away to show any perspective distortion (like a huge nose
with a 16mm lens up close and personal).
>From a matter of taste, in this set, I like the 28 because the Three
Brothers is more dominant in it's image size-it's a more interesting subject
than the extra trees the 24 adds. IMHO...
Good work,
Bob F
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joel Wilcox
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 4:14 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] 28mm and 24mm compared
Here are two photos of the same subject, made from the same spot, with 28mm
and 24mm lenses. The tripod was not moved (i.e., my "back was to the wall"
as Walt would say):
http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/28_or_24.html
Is it just a matter of fitting more in with the 24, or is there any
additional difference in perspective?
Joel W.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|