Ever since i got a 24 mm F.28 on the bay a month ago i have fallen in love
with it. Adds just the extra width without the excess of a 21 mm F3.5 that I
used to own.
Can't make up your mind, bring both. they are so small one in each pocket
fits. Thats why zuikos are pocket jewels. I dont think I will lust for the
F2 version since anyway its much more expensive and I am very happy with teh
images of the 24 F2.8. more and more I dont like carrying a heavy kit. One
day this laziness may push me to sell off all my brighter lenses.
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "olympus @ Zuiko . sls . bc . ca" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [OM] 24mm or 28mm do you use more for travelling?
>
>
>
>
> > Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Do you guys find the 24mm a little too wide or no?
>
> Too wide for what ?
>
> >
> > My buddy swears by the 35mm.. He says it's the perfect street
> > perspective, you can get close with it or take a few steps back and
> > get
> > a slight scenery effect.
>
> Originally you asked 24 or 28. Since you're now bringing in the 35 where
are you
> gonig ?
>
> >
> > I shoot my 50mm all the time.. It seems closer to the perspective
> > I'm
> > use to, but on a few trips out, I was looking for something a bit
> > wider..
> >
>
> 35 is a bit wider, 28 is a bit more wider and 24 is a lot more wider. I
tend to use
> a 35 as a "standard".
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|