The 200/4 is not bad optically but it is very easy subject to
vibration, handheld with shutter speed of greater than 1/250s will get
most out of it. Use tripod at 1/4s to 1/125s will not easy get very
sharp pictures.
C.H.Ling
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>
> on 14/05/2003 17:46, Garth Wood at garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I understand why the 200/4.0 Zuiko has such a mediocre
> > reputation. I too have heard these comments, and they bemuse me
> Really? A mediocre reputation? Maybe less sharp than the F5, and focuses min
> at 2.5 meters instead of 2 meters like some Nikkor I know of.
> But I've done even beautiful portraits with it.
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|