Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM 500mm CAT

Subject: Re: [OM] OM 500mm CAT
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 18:18:06 -0400
I have a 300/2.8 Tamron, and I have used it both with and without 
the "normal" filter in place, sometimes shooting with an empty 
filter holder.  I haven't been able to tell any difference.  Am I 
missing something?  Should I look closer?  Not knowing any better, 
I assumed, probably out of ignorance born of thinking I know more 
than I really do, that the less glass the better.  Now it seems I 
may be wrong.  Again.

Either way, it's a great lens.

Walt

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Sun, 04 May 2003 14:56:19 -0700

>For those who don't know, many long lenses use small filters in 
>the back of the optical path, but need piece of glass in place 
>always to keep the optical performance correct. They come with a 
>clear or skylight filter in place when new.

---SNIP--- 


 
                   

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz