Bluetooth is short range only (up to 10m I believe, without getting
out the instructions for my cellphone). Longer range networks would
require more microwave base stations and we do *not* need more of
those on top of the cellphone installations!
Chris
At 5:05 pm -0500 14/3/03, Mike Darling wrote:
Isn't that one of the selling points for the 'bluetooth' technology we've
been hearing about?
On 3/14/03 3:12 PM, "tOM Trottier" <Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A wireless network, with live transfer of pictures when taken, would not
only eliminate the cable, but could eliminate the need for mega-storage in
the camera, and free the photographer to move around without carrying a
laptop or hard drive. There could even be an alarm if the laptop or camera
> move out of a specified range.
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|