Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :)

from Dizel

Subject:	Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :)
From:	Dizel <webmaster@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:47:22 +0100

... but the hood for the 40/2 and 85/2 is not as attractive as thepurpose-built hood for the 50/1.8...


But I have only this one! :) Will see in SIF how it looks like..
:)
--
--
                                St.
               (XS360 Diesel - Sampo Lappelil, Z'liMC)
                   http://www.familyofman2.com
       GH !d a- C--- E---- W+++ N+++ PS+++ !tv b+++ D++ e++ h* r%



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Now something lighthearted :), Dizel Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Chris Barker Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Dizel <= Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Moose Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Moose Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Dizel [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Bernard Frangoulis Re: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Dizel Re: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Dizel RE: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, George M. Anderson Re: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Dizel Re: [OM] Do filter coatings alter image quality?, Chris Barker

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] NOW: Dizel's images WAS: i'm the heretic - was lenses an d aperture rings, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	*[OM] ( OM ) 100/2.8 on De bay*, Brian Swale*
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Now something lighthearted :), Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]