In the message I received, Craig Cunningham writes:
Derek, Craig,
>Definitely go with the 35/2.8 -- I'm considering the 100/2.8 at KEH, so I=
>
>believe that you'd be better served if you bought the 35 and leave me a f=
>ew
>more days to consider the 100 :-0
Don't take your time. Don't question your addiction. Buy it. Buy it. Buy
it.
Seriously though, 100/2.8 is a wonderful lens. Small, handy and will
become part of your take everywhere setup before you know it. And, in
extreme cases, it's wonderfully pocketable. (Don't ask -- I have huge
pockets when on short hikes.)
Of course, you need the SC one for nice, warm colours.
And if you still have doubts wether or not it's a good investment, ask
silvernosed about the glow. :-)
HTH,
Saso
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|