I have the 24/2.8, which I like a lot and find very crisp. Wouldn't
the 21
give too similar a coverage? In my case the way to go would probably
be the
18/35, but this one is way more expansive. Or the Tokina or Tamron 17,
for
which I have read mixed reviews.
Bernard
So far, I've been able to resist getting a 24, so I've never directly
compared them. I have heard from some that the difference is enough to
justify both focal lengths. I do think that if I only had a 24, I'd
want something wider too. Of course, I also see myself getting an 18
before a 24, so I don't think I'm terribly objective :)
Mark.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|