Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: g [OM] How big is too big?

Subject: Re: g [OM] How big is too big?
From: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:00:02 -0800
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:54:20 -0600
From: "Gary L. Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] How big is too big?

I'm reworking my gallery site and I am trying to decide how big is too big
for image files.  I've tried in the past to keep the files under about 28 kB
for a 650x450 pixel image. But, that is resulting in visible .jpg artifacts
in some images, prompting one of my beta reviewers to rightfully complain.
So, when you are viewing a gallery of images, how long are you willing to
wait for an image to load?  And how big is that in kB for your particular
internet capability?

And, yes, I know about progressive load images.  How do you feel about
those?

Gary Edwards



Gary, I usually rescale images to 800x600 pixels; I fnd that works well to give everyone an idea, keep sharpness good with respect to rescaling, and maintain good image quality. As for size, up to 360 K works for me. That's how I post on Photosig.

Cheers,
Stephen.
--


2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic!

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: g [OM] How big is too big?, Stephen Scharf <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz