Well, heck. I didn't say The Man Show was without merit, only that
Gallagher's show was more creative. I like those merits. Bouncing....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] NOW: Way more OT ,WAS: Dipping our Toe Into Digital (LONG)
> Gallagher had his moments. One of my favorites was about
> spelling, that there was no "wo" in "one," but "two" had a "wo" it
> didn't need. Then there was that great philosophical question
> of, "How come we drive on a parkway and park on a driveway?"
>
> Of course, I questioned the sanity of people who would pay for
> front row seats where they had to protect themselves with sheets
> of plastic from the sledge-o-matic shower.
>
> As for The Man Show -- well, they do have lots of beer and juggies
> jumping on trampolines. What more do you want?
>
> Walt
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 09:51:28 -0500
>
> >Yep, he said the knob marked 'brightness' "don't work". As crude
> >as the show was, the level of creativity and topical humor made
> >it more lofty than say, The Man Show. I thought the diving
> >invisible elephant was quite inventive.
> >-Mickey
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|