Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] are 1.55 volt batteries OK for the OM-4 ?

Subject: Re: [OM] are 1.55 volt batteries OK for the OM-4 ?
From: "Diego Sierralta" <cachuu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:47:59 -0400

ok, so what´s an un-converted om-1 to use? I believe I can still find mercury batteries here in venezuela, at least the one I have on it right now is.... will any other battery throw the metering off?


----Original Message Follows----
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] are 1.55 volt batteries OK for the OM-4 ?
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:53:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from zuiko.sls.bc.ca ([139.142.66.252]) by mc7-f13.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:55:53 -0800
Received: (qmail 16889 invoked by uid 2); 23 Nov 2002 06:55:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 16883 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2002 06:55:43 -0000
Received: from www.sls.bc.ca (HELO proxy.sls.bc.ca) (139.142.66.3) by zuiko.sls.bc.ca with SMTP; 23 Nov 2002 06:55:43 -0000 Received: FROM fw.sls.bc.ca BY proxy.sls.bc.ca ; Fri Nov 22 22:55:43 2002 -0800 Received: from apollo.spitfire.net ([207.227.203.3])by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA30483for <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:55:41 -0800 Received: from netusa1.spitfire.net [65.128.104.39] by apollo.spitfire.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A55D168016C; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:51:09 -0500
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz