Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: CF tripods

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: CF tripods
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:12:05 -0800


Pound for pound, $ for $, the best performance weight-saving is for the
*rider* (or photographer... <g>) to drop a few pounds. Costs less and
benefits are much more likely to be beneficial.

I guess I don't use a tripod enough to understand why someone would pay $300
or more for a CF one... but that said, I guess I'd take one if someone gives
one away. My old Bogen 3011 works OK otherwise, and its no lightweight!
--

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...

I guess the issue is whether you would use a tripod more often if it weighed half of what the 3011 weighs and whether the improvement in sharpness in the old pics is worth it.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz