On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:26:49PM +0200, Peter Stvcklein wrote:
> I understand. I own both. The 2/35 is a bad design (look at the front
> element). Dark edges even at an aperture of 5.6.
I can`t disagree more. Although my trusty 35/2 now has strong compettition
im my kit it is a never to sale lens, because of it`s performance.
To jude the performance of a wideangel-lens by comapiring the
vingetting with a tele in not fair.
The natural (=mostly unavoidable) vingetting of a 35mm lens is
0.9 f-stop (cos^4-rule). While a 85 mm lens has only 0.2 F-stop
natural vingetting (=none).
CoFo meassured the vingetting of the 35mm Zuiko, and it matches
the natural vingetting at F5.6.
see:
http://studweb.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de/studweb/users/mas/mas12462/OM/MTF/Zuiko-2-35neu.html
I´ve seen no 35-mm lens with noticeably less vingetting stopped
down. The curved front element is pretty positive in respect to vingetting.
Don`t be so hard with a wide angel lens, and enjoy it`s other
advantages.
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|