| Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM) Walk-around lens preference |
|---|---|
| From: | "Bolty" <boldbolty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:13:13 -0000 |
"although some try to tie it to "need," we all! know better. Bill Barber " Need can be a very loose term... I need that shift lens for, I need that fish eye for... I need that 350 f2.8 for. See there will always be a "need" for as many lenses that you can possibly afford or carry :-) PS I think that can also apply to the extensive range of Olympus accessories. Cheers Adam |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 35 - 80 f2.8 spotted in UK, julian_davies |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] (OT?) Epson 2450 status, William Clark |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM) Walk-around lens preference, NSURIT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM) Walk-around lens preference, Jim Brokaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |