Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 01:36:29 -0700
on 9/14/02 2:27 PM, Brian Swale at bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Winsor Crosby wrote:, forwarded by Moose
> 
>> It is well known that 35mm lenses are sharper than medium format and
>> large format lenses.
> 
> Hi folks; not necessarily true.  The Zeiss Sonnar 250mm SuperAchromat CFi
> lens for Hasslefree is reputed to be the sharpest lens in current production;
> capable of delivering 600 (I think it is, should look it up) lines per (
> mm/inch I 
> need to look up again). This topic came up about 9 months ago when we
> talked over the maximum detail that film could record.  Whether it is lines
> per 
> mm or inch, it is still away better than any lens most people have. And it
> should be possible to fit it to an OM body.

I remember that... probably should be 600lp/mm, because 600lp/inch is only
about 40lp/mm, which isn't all that impressive. I remember seeing somewhere
that the typical Pen F lens was capable of pretty impressive resolution,
something like 80lp/mm or more... the supposed need to provide more
resolution due to the smaller film format resulted in some pretty
high-quality designs.
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney... 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz