Re: [OM] more on film

[Winsor Crosby]

> In <001001c25c2b$e83f3200$9387d940@xxxxxxxxxx>, on 09/14/02 at 03:18 PM,
>    "Bill Pearce" <bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> > I haven't tried Agfa in a few years, and probably should again. I used
> > to use the old CT18 process 64 speed a lot, much better that the E4
> > Kodak films.
> Anyone know whether Agfa will still process CT18 -- or would they just
> fall helpless with laughter? I discovered a cache of it buried deep in a
> freezer last week. I'm trying to decide whether to try to use it, or
> declare it missing in action.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> ---------------------------------------------
I would guess that you are out of luck.  With my last few rolls many 
years ago, the Paramus, New Jersey mailer address forwarded it to 
West Germany for processing. It was not long after that the E6 
process films were introduced.
 I really don't think you would want to do it though.  Film has come 
a long way since then. Why not use a modern film worthy of your 
modern efforts? But you could contact Agfa to see.  They have their 
labs in the US for the special processing of their B&W positive film. 
Maybe they do other stuff too.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >