| Subject: | RE: [OM] In lieu of a digital OM back, a 35mm scanner?; Linux |
|---|---|
| From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:45:11 -0700 |
Andrew, don't hold back on us... tell us exactly what you think... <g> -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Beals The next alternative in terms of price, the HP S20, is a piece of crap in my opinion, having tried one. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] In lieu of a digital OM back, a 35mm scanner?; Linux, Andrew Beals |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Another question for the real OM 3Ti experts, Olaf Iwert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] In lieu of a digital OM back, a 35mm scanner?; Linux, Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] In lieu of a digital OM back, a 35mm scanner?; Linux, Andrew Beals |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |